Pre-Alpha

LEGAL3 is launching soon! Join the waitlist

Trust Validation

The White Lists, in collaboration with a network of trusted industry partners, is responsible for validating the authenticity of critical information related to asset claims, ensuring only credible ownership claims are recognized.

The White Web Ecosystem

As part of The White Web ecosystem, LEGAL3 leverages cutting-edge technologies like AO for scalable computation and Arweave for permanent storage to create a trust-driven platform where asset custody is verifiable, secure, and future-proof.

AO Computation

Powers the validation and trust scoring processes with scalable, decentralized computation, ensuring efficient and reliable assessment of asset claims.

Arweave Storage

Provides permanent, tamper-proof storage for all validated asset records, ensuring they cannot be altered or deleted over time.

Cross-Domain Support

Enables validation of assets across Real World, Online, and Web3 domains, creating a unified approach to trust and verification.

Decentralized Validation Approach

Our decentralized approach ensures that ownership and custody records are rigorously vetted, combining automated tools, expert reviews, and community input to create a robust trust assessment.

Automated Verification

Advanced algorithms and AI tools perform initial verification checks on submitted documentation, analyzing for authenticity and consistency.

Expert Review

Domain specialists from our partner network provide human oversight, applying their expertise to validate complex or high-value asset claims.

Community Input

A network of trusted community validators contributes additional verification, creating a consensus-based approach to trust.

The White Lists

The White Lists serves as the cornerstone of LEGAL3's trust validation framework, bringing together industry experts and specialized partners to ensure the highest standards of verification.

Establishes rigorous validation protocols for different asset classes and industries

Coordinates the validation process across multiple stakeholders and verification methods

Maintains the integrity of the validation ecosystem through ongoing quality assurance

Ensures that validation results are transparent, auditable, and resistant to manipulation

Validation Process

1

Initial Submission

2

Automated Checks

3

Expert Review

4

Community Validation

5

Trust Score Assignment

The Validation Process in Detail

The White Lists employs a rigorous, multi-layered validation approach that combines technological verification with human expertise to ensure the highest standards of trust.

Validation Workflow

1

Initial Submission Analysis

When an asset is submitted, automated systems perform preliminary checks on the documentation, including digital signature verification, metadata analysis, and cross-referencing with existing records.

2

Domain-Specific Validation

Based on the asset type, specialized validation protocols are applied. For example, real estate assets undergo property record verification, while digital assets may require cryptographic proof of creation.

3

Expert Review

Industry specialists from The White Lists partner network review the submission, applying their domain expertise to verify authenticity and identify potential issues.

4

Community Validation

A network of trusted community validators provides additional verification, creating a consensus-based approach that prevents centralized control or manipulation.

5

Final Validation Decision

The White Lists aggregates all validation inputs to make a final determination on the asset's authenticity and assigns an initial trust score in collaboration with TRU3.

Validation Methods

Document Analysis

Advanced document verification techniques including digital signature validation, forensic analysis of electronic documents, and metadata examination to detect tampering or forgery.

Blockchain Verification

For Web3 assets, cryptographic verification of on-chain data, smart contract auditing, and transaction history analysis to confirm ownership and provenance.

Legal Record Cross-Referencing

Verification against official records and databases where applicable, such as property registries, copyright offices, and trademark databases.

AI-Assisted Pattern Recognition

Machine learning algorithms that identify patterns consistent with authentic documentation versus fraudulent claims, continuously improving through feedback loops.

Validation Standards

Transparency: All validation criteria are publicly documented and consistently applied across all asset types.

Auditability: The validation process creates an audit trail that can be reviewed without compromising privacy.

Consistency: Standardized protocols ensure that similar assets undergo comparable validation processes.

Adaptability: Validation methods evolve to address new threats and technologies while maintaining rigorous standards.

Validation Outcomes

The validation process results in one of several possible outcomes, each with specific implications for the asset record:

Validated

Asset claim meets all validation criteria and is permanently stored with a high initial trust score.

Conditionally Validated

Asset claim meets most criteria but requires additional verification or documentation to achieve full validation.

Rejected

Asset claim fails to meet validation standards and is not permanently stored, with detailed feedback provided to the submitter.

Partner Network

The White Lists leverages partnerships with specialists across legal, blockchain, and asset verification sectors to evaluate submissions. These partners contribute domain-specific expertise, ensuring that validations are thorough and reliable.

Legal Experts

Attorneys and legal professionals who specialize in property law, intellectual property, and digital asset ownership.

"Our legal partners ensure that asset claims comply with relevant jurisdictional requirements and legal standards."

Property law specialists
Intellectual property attorneys
Contract law experts

Blockchain Validators

Technical specialists who verify on-chain assets and ensure the integrity of blockchain-based ownership records.

"Our blockchain partners provide cryptographic verification of digital assets and on-chain ownership claims."

Smart contract auditors
Cryptographic experts
Blockchain forensics specialists

Industry Specialists

Domain experts from various industries who understand the nuances of specific asset types and ownership structures.

"From real estate appraisers to art authenticators, our industry specialists bring deep domain knowledge to the validation process."

Real estate appraisers
Art and collectible authenticators
Digital content specialists

Partner Qualification Process

The White Lists maintains rigorous standards for partner selection, ensuring that only qualified experts participate in the validation process:

Expertise Verification

Partners must demonstrate proven expertise in their domain through credentials, experience, and peer recognition.

Integrity Assessment

Partners undergo background checks and must adhere to a strict code of ethics to ensure unbiased validation.

Performance Monitoring

Ongoing evaluation of partner validation quality ensures consistent standards and identifies areas for improvement.

Continuous Education

Partners receive regular training on emerging technologies, fraud detection techniques, and validation best practices.

TRU3's Trust Scoring System

TRU3's dynamic trust scoring system works in close integration with The White Lists validation process, creating a comprehensive trust framework that evolves over time and adapts to new information.

Validation to Trust Score Pipeline

1

Initial Validation Results

When The White Lists completes its validation process, it generates a detailed validation report containing:

  • Validation outcome (Validated, Conditionally Validated, or Rejected)
  • Confidence levels for different aspects of the validation
  • Specific verification methods used and their results
  • Expert assessments and notes
2

Data Transmission

This validation data is securely transmitted to TRU3 via encrypted channels. The data is cryptographically signed to ensure its integrity and authenticity, creating an immutable record of the validation results.

3

Trust Score Calculation

TRU3's algorithms process the validation data to generate an initial trust score, weighing various factors according to asset type, validation methods used, and confidence levels.

4

Score Publication

The calculated trust score is published alongside the asset record on Arweave, creating a permanent, tamper-proof record of both the asset and its trust assessment.

Trust Score Evolution

Continuous Monitoring

Unlike static validation systems, TRU3 continuously monitors assets and updates their trust scores based on new information, challenges, or additional verifications.

Feedback Loops

When users interact with assets or provide feedback on their authenticity, this data feeds back into the trust scoring system, creating a dynamic assessment that improves over time.

Periodic Re-validation

High-value or sensitive assets undergo periodic re-validation by The White Lists, with results feeding back into TRU3 to ensure trust scores remain current and accurate.

Trust Score Components

Validation Quality
40%

The thoroughness and rigor of the validation process, including the number and types of verification methods used.

Expert Consensus
25%

The level of agreement among expert validators regarding the asset's authenticity and ownership.

Documentation Completeness
20%

The comprehensiveness and quality of documentation provided to support the asset claim.

Historical Consistency
15%

The consistency of the asset's history and provenance, including previous transfers and validations.

Trust Score Applications

A

Risk Assessment

Financial institutions and insurers use trust scores to assess risk when lending against assets or providing insurance coverage.

B

Transaction Confidence

Buyers and sellers rely on trust scores to establish confidence in transactions, reducing the need for additional due diligence.

C

Legal Standing

In disputes, high trust scores provide strong evidence of ownership, often carrying significant weight in legal proceedings.

D

Market Valuation

Assets with higher trust scores often command premium prices in the market due to reduced risk and increased buyer confidence.

Technical Implementation

Data Integration

The White Lists and TRU3 are integrated through a secure API that enables real-time data exchange while maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of validation results.

  • Encrypted data transmission using industry-standard protocols
  • Digital signatures to verify data authenticity
  • Immutable audit trails of all data exchanges

Algorithmic Processing

TRU3 employs sophisticated algorithms that process validation data to generate trust scores:

  • Machine learning models trained on validated asset datasets
  • Bayesian inference to update trust scores as new evidence emerges
  • Domain-specific scoring models for different asset classes
  • Anomaly detection to identify potential fraud or inconsistencies

Trust Score Visualization

Low Trust0-59

Insufficient validation or significant concerns about authenticity

Medium Trust60-79

Basic validation completed with some outstanding questions

High Trust80-100

Comprehensive validation with strong consensus on authenticity

Technical Architecture

LEGAL3's architecture is modular, decentralized, and designed for scalability, ensuring robust validation and trust assessment across all asset types.

Blockchain Layer

  • AO for scalable computation
  • Arweave for permanent storage
  • Smart contracts for validation workflows

Identity & Trust Layer

  • NAM3 for decentralized identity
  • The White Lists for validation
  • TRU3 for dynamic trust scoring

Application Layer

  • Web-based dApp interface
  • API for third-party integration
  • The White Books for selective disclosure

Data Flow

1

Asset Submission

2

Validation Process

3

Trust Scoring

4

Permanent Storage

Benefits of Our Cooperative Validation Model

This cooperative validation model reduces the risk of fraud, enhances transparency, and ensures that LEGAL3's trust assessments are grounded in both technology and human expertise, making it a trusted solution for proving asset custody.

Reduced Fraud Risk

Multi-layered validation makes fraudulent claims extremely difficult to pass through the system.

Enhanced Transparency

Clear validation processes and criteria ensure users understand how trust is established.

Human + Technology

Combines the efficiency of automated tools with the nuanced judgment of human experts.

Ecosystem Growth

The partner network continues to expand, bringing more specialized expertise to the platform.

Team and Vision

LEGAL3 is developed by Audax Nitor Inc., led by Philippe Royer, a direct sales veteran with a deep understanding of trust and accountability.

Philippe Royer

Founder & CEO, Audax Nitor Inc.

Our vision is to create a world where proving asset ownership is simple, secure, and universally trusted—regardless of domain or technology. By integrating LEGAL3 into The White Web, we're building the most transparent and accountable ecosystem in Web3, where trust drives cooperation and innovation.

Experience Trust-Based Validation

Join our Pre-Alpha program and be among the first to benefit from our cooperative validation model.